Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Max Purcell vs Arthur Fery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Purcell vs Fery analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Purcell vs Arthur Fery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Purcell 0 - 0 Fery
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Purcell has won 52.51% of points on his second serve, while Fery has won 46.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Purcell, in recent form, has won 45.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fery has won 49.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26% and 37.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Purcell has saved 61.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fery has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Purcell has won 41.07% of matches played (W/L 23/ 33), with Fery winning 65% (W/L 39/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 205/ 142), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Fery has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 35/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 34.62% of matches (W/L 9/ 17), where as Fery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.96 while Fery has played against players with an average rank of 225.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Purcell has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fery has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Purcell has converted 31.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fery has converted 45.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
94
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
246
Rank
246
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (275-206)
Career Total W/L
62% (90-56)
38% (9-15)
YTD W/L
63% (10-6)
$1,046,175
Career Prize Money
$32,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Max Purcell | Arthur Fery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (9/15) | 63% (10/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (25/40) | 63% (22/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (288/342) | 55% (184/152) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 62% (8/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 176 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:23 | 1:44:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 213.29 | 341.06 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1123/1978) | 64% (717/1118) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (797/1123) | 69% (494/717) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (449/855) | 46% (186/401) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (44/139) | 45% (55/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (626/1901) | 42% (451/1066) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 62% (8/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 67% (10/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (17/4) | 17% (6/1) |
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Henri Squire
Player
Max Purcell
64%
(
96 of
149)
1st Serve %
52%
(
82 of
157)
10
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
53 of
82)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
34%
(
51 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
62 of
157)
160
Total Points Won
146
|
6-2 6-2 3-6 4-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Remy Bertola
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Fajing Sun
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Max Purcell
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marcos Giron
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Arthur Fery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Arthur Fery
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Arthur Fery
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Ricardas Berankis
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Arthur Fery
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 6-7(8) 4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Arthur Fery
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Jules Marie
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Purcell Vs Fery Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
